Justice
Oliver Wendell Holmes’s opinion in the 1919 United States Supreme
Court case Schenck v. United States held that speech that is
dangerous AND false is not protected, as opposed to speech that is
dangerous but also true.
Holmes wrote:
The most stringent protection of free speech would not
protect a man falsely shouting FIRE in a theater and causing a panic.
The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such
circumstances and are of such a nature to create a clear and present
danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress
has a right to prevent.
“Shouting FIRE in a Crowded Theater” on Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
Today the legal definition of free speech is,
The right to express information, ideas, and opinions
free of government restrictions based on content and subject only to
reasonable limitations (as the power of the government to avoid a
clear and present danger) especially as guaranteed buy the First and
Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
Members of Congress have a sworn duty to uphold the Constitution.
This means that Congress has a duty to protect America from the
substantive evils of those attempting to replace our Constitution
with religious supremacist Islamic sharia law.
The question is not, “Is it irrational to fear Islam?” The
question is, “Is it irrational to fear Islamists?”
Islamists by definition
Islamists are sharia compliant Muslims who advocate or support
Islamic militancy and/or Islamic fundamentalism. Islamists target any
nonbeliever – Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, and non-sharia
compliant Muslims who are all considered infidels.
Islamic militancy is seen in jihadi terror attacks on soft targets
– infidels in pizzerias, nightclubs, airports, on beaches, and in
train stations. Islamic militancy is seen in organized military
jihadist groups like Al-Queda, ISIS, Boko Haram, Hamas, Hezbollah,
and in their military attacks on infidels like the slaughter of
Christians in South
Sudan and the catastrophic September 11th attack on
American soil. Islamic militancy is easily identified and must be
resolutely opposed.
Islamic fundamentalism, the non-military component of Islamism, is
far more insidious but has the same goal of replacing our
Constitution with sharia law to “Make America Muslim” in its
quest to establish a worldwide Islamic caliphate.
Islamophobia is congruent to…
That brings us to Islamophobia – a term that has been
successfully weaponized in America to silence any criticism or
discussion of Islamism.
Islamophobia is defined as an unwarranted irrational fear of
Islam, and an Islamophobe is an individual who experiences this fear.
So, is it irrational to fear Islam? The question appears simple but
its answer is complex.
Guns don’t kill people – people do. So it is with Islam. Islam
doesn’t kill people – Islamists do. Who are these Islamists and
is it irrational to fear them?
Those who start the fire in a crowded theater
The Muslim
Brotherhood represents Islamic fundamentalism in America. Its
propaganda arm is the Council on Islamic-American Relations (CAIR).
The singular objective of the Muslim Brotherhood was defined by its
founder Hassan Al-Banna in Egypt in 1928. It was and continues to be
the establishment of an Islamic caliphate that will make the world
Muslim – including America.
Muslim fundamentalism requires strict adherence to religious
supremacist sharia law. Islam is a replacement theology when
practiced by sharia compliant Muslims because they only recognize the
authority of religious sharia law – they do not recognize the
authority of the United States Constitution.
Americans are being deliberately confused by politicians and the
mainstream media still insisting that Islam is a religion like any
other. It isn’t. Sharia compliant Muslims like Reps. Ilhan Omar and
Rashida Tlaib are Muslim fundamentalists whose objective is to make
America Muslim. They do it with their votes and by screaming
Islamophobia anytime they are criticized or exposed for their
seditious views.
Case in point: Judge Jeanine Pirro
The recent suspension of Judge Jeanine Pirro for questioning the
symbolism of Ilhan Omar’s hijab is a case in point. The Judge made
her 3.9.19 opening remarks in response to several outrageous antisemitic comments made by Rep. Omar. Her infamous tweet, “Israel has
hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken people and help them see the
evil doings of Israel,” expresses the anti-Israel bias and
antisemitism of Omar’s Muslim Brotherhood affiliation. The flaccid
response of the Democrat party that did not censure her by name was
described by Steve
Emerson as, “a watered-down resolution condemning multiple forms of bigotry after many on the left came to
the defense of Omar.”
What is defensible about Ilhan Omar’s antisemitism? The Judge
was asking if Omar’s hijab symbolized her adherence to antisemitic
supremacist Islamic sharia law. It is a valid question.
The judge didn’t shout FIRE in a crowded
theater
In a free society where freedom of speech is only restricted by
things like falsely shouting FIRE in a crowded theater, the response
to the Judge’s legitimate and important question was absolutely
stunning yet unsurprising.
The predictable shrieks of Islamophobia were echoed across the
mainstream media and Muslim Brotherhood’s CAIR demanded the
permanent removal of Judge Jeanine Pirro. Of course he did – Rep.
Ilhan Omar fund-raises for CAIR. Judge Jeanine Pirro posed a threat
to the Muslim Brotherhood as one of the few conservative voices still
on the air questioning and exposing creeping sharia law in American
society.
Political correctness
Islamophobia has become the politically correct metric that
determines what is protected free speech. How did this happen? What
about Oliver Wendell Holmes?
Accusations of Islamophobia made during Obama’s tenure became
the bludgeon used to silence any oppositional voices to the Muslim
Brotherhood’s advancing agenda of making America Muslim. Writers,
journalists, politicians, and political analysts who began to
identify the stealth jihad being waged against America by Islamists
in suits were silenced by Obama and his gang. Just like the
accusation of “Racist” was used to silence anyone questioning or
criticizing the behavior of a black person, so is the accusation
“Islamophobe” being used to silence anyone questioning or
criticizing the behavior of a Muslim.
Here is the problem.
The accusation of Islamophobia concerns itself exclusively with
the WHO and ignores the WHAT of behavior. The accusation of
Islamophobia focuses on who is being accused and ignores what the
person did. So, if a non-Muslim (Jeanine Pirro) questions the actions
of a Muslim (Omar) wearing the symbol of sharia compliance (hijab),
the non-Muslim is accused of Islamophobia and the meaning of the
Muslim wearing the hijab is ignored.
Accusations of Islamophobia are powerful weapons being used to
conceal the Muslim Brotherhood’s stealth civilizational
jihad against America. This is how it works.
Judge Jeanine Pirro’s question about Omar’s hijab is the
dangerous but also true speech that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
identified as protected free speech. Cunning accusations of
Islamophobia are then used to deliberately silence the Judge and
deprive her of the Constitutional rights that Congress is sworn to
protect.
What can be done?
Americans must inform themselves and become aware of the Muslim
Brotherhood’s propaganda arm CAIR and its powerful influence in
Washington. The Washington swamp is infested with leftist creatures,
Islamist creatures, and globalist creatures all relying on the
swamp’s dark murky waters to stay concealed from public view. Most
people are afraid of swamps and the dangerous creatures that inhabit
them. The Washington swamp is unique – the creatures it protects are
just human and the dangers it hides only require an informed public
protected by free speech to be neutralized.
Falsely shouting FIRE in a crowded theater and accusations of
Islamophobia are both dangerous and false. The Muslim Brotherhood
poses a clear and present danger to the United States in its support
for Islamic supremacy, Islamic militancy, Islamic fundamentalism, and
their clearly stated objective to replace the U.S. Constitution with
sharia law and make America Muslim.
So, is it irrational to fear Islamists?
Fear is the natural human response to danger and it is extremely
rational to fear those who wish to destroy you. Once the threat is
acknowledged and the decision made on how to protect oneself, fear is
no longer necessary. The courage to confront the threat is what is
required.
The Muslim Brotherhood and every one of its seditious
organizations must be declared terrorist organizations and be
expunged from American society.
What America needs now is the courage to confront the Muslim Brotherhood.
This article appears here at Pundicity.com.
The featured photograph of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., ca. 1930, comes from the Harris and Ewing Collection, Library of Congress. It is in the public domain today.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.