Guest Columns
Bisexual Senator Loves the Constitution Yet Shuns the Author – Then On Whose Behalf is She Serving?
“Without morals, a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure (and) which insures to the good eternal happiness, are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of FREE governments.” So said Charles Carroll, Signer of the Declaration of Independence.
Senator refuses to swear on a Bible
Dr. Jerry Newcomb reported this week on Sons of Liberty Media that last week, the first openly bisexual U.S. senator was sworn in, and she refused to be sworn in on the Holy Bible, as is customary. She instead opted for a law book with the Arizona Constitution and the U.S. Constitution. She says she chose the book because of her “love for the Constitution.”
Sen. Kyrsten Sinema has a first name that ironically means “Follower of Christ” in Latin. In addition to being openly bisexual, she is also listed as the “only member of the Senate who does not identify as a member of a religion” according to the Pew Research Center for Religion and Public Life.
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/the-irony-of-refusing-to-swear-in-on-the-bible/
Who, then, does she serve, if not God?
A representative that promises to serve the people yet, shuns the author? If she does not love God, then how is it that she can serve His government on the behalf of His people (1 John 5:2)?
If she declares that she does not believe in God (Psalm 14:1), then whom does she make reference when it comes to that which is right and wrong, according to law (Exodus 20)?
If it is not God’s government that she is too serve in upholding the enumerated laws of the US Constitution that she claims to love, then one has to ask as to where her loyalty lies? Plain and simple, she then is undermining American law, period.
It is not the people that gave her delegated authority to do act out in such a manner, for the people received their rights from the One that she denies. Think about it. This idolater has no business whatsoever serving in the US government in any capacity (1 Corinthians 14:34-35).
What God condemns…
Furthermore, she claims to be a bisexual (Romans 1:24-32) woman. Anyone paying attention to the fact that when a people advocate that which the Lord condemns (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13), a door is soon open for the enemies to walk through (Deuteronomy 4:6; contrast 28:63).
First, the sodomite communities get a pass from the people in this country to do that which God and American law (The two sciences that run together-James Wilson) clearly condemn (Look to your states statues).
Secondly, on the heels of the sodomites are the subversive Communists, Muslims and God knows who else, who are not here to assimilate, but to destroy (Deuteronomy 28:43). There is a clear pattern being played out before your eyes and it must be carefully watched (Proverbs 14:34).
It’s happened in France, Germany, Canada, etc.
Now let’s counter this subversive nonsense and take a look to what, in contrast to this said senator what it is that our founding forefathers have established.
The Founders speak
Founding father John Witherspoon said:
“Whoever is an avowed enemy of God, I scruple not to call him an enemy of his country …”
Witherspoon concluded:
“It is in the man of piety and inward principle, that we may expect to find the uncorrupted patriot, the useful citizen, and the invincible soldier …
God grant that in America true religion and civil liberty may be inseparable and that the unjust attempts to destroy the one, may in the issue tend to the support and establishment of both.
… the Glory of God, the public interest of religion and the good of others, as civil liberty cannot be long preserved without virtue. A Republic must either preserve its virtue or lose its liberty.”
These people are reprobates and are standing in direct opposition to our founding forefathers and what it is that they established.
President John Adams said:
“Our Constitution was made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
Where did our forefathers get this understanding? Look to their forefathers.
The Mayflower Compact
IN THE NAME OF GOD, AMEN. We, whose names are underwritten, the Loyal Subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, &c. Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the northern Parts of Virginia; Do by these Presents, solemnly and mutually, in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance of the Ends aforesaid:
And by Virtue hereof do enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal Laws, Ordinances, Acts, Constitutions, and Officers, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general Good of the Colony; unto which we promise all due Submission and Obedience. IN WITNESS whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape-Cod the eleventh of November, in the Reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth, Anno Domini; 1620
Now Americans, look to your forefathers.
Presidents from Washington to Jackson and following…
On April 30, 1789, the first president of these united States, George Washington, took his oath with his hand on the Bible open to Deuteronomy 28, the chapter that promises blessings and curses on a nation in accordance with its faithfulness or unfaithfulness to keep God’s Word.
At the end of the oath, Washington added the words “So help me God,” and leaned over and kissed the Bible.
Since then, President Andrew Jackson stated:
“The Bible is the Rock upon which our REPUBLIC rests.”
“The Bible is the cornerstone for American liberty.” – President Thomas Jefferson
“For my own part, I sincerely esteem it (the Constitution) a system which without the finger of God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests.”
“The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.” -Alexander Hamilton
Either the American people are going to take heed to the Word of God in keeping His Commandments or they are going to willfully subject themselves to His curses (Exodus 23:32-33).
Bradlee Dean is an ordained Christian preacher, Radio show host for the #1 show on Genesis Communication Network from 2-3 p.m. central standard (The Sons of Liberty), a National Tea Party favorite. He also speaks on high school and college campuses nationwide. Bradlee is also an author, a husband to one, daddy to four boys. You have probably seen Bradlee through such outlets as The New York Times, Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, The Weekly Standard etc.
This is a splendid article. The educational videos are well worth watching. Bisexual senator Sinema exemplifies the twisted thinking and perverted life that results from “truth suppression” (Romans 1:18ff).
Everyone should read link to biblegateway.com
The first thing to note she is not bi-sexual. She is human and is female. She is not an earthworm or a plant which are bi-sexual lifeforms. She is a person who apparently engages in sodomy and supports abnormal behaviors like sodomy. The proper terms need to used, not distorted terms.
The word you are looking for in regard to worms (or other animals) is hermaphroditic; having both male and female reproductive organs, either simultaneously or sequentially. In humans specifically, discrepancies between external genitalia and internal structures are described as _intersex_ conditions. Thus in humans true hermaphoditism and male and female pseudohermaphroditism are all forms of intersex.
In plants, the terminology is much more complex: plants with flowers that have both male and female structures in the same flower are also called hermaphroditic (or monoclinous in angiosperms), and the flowers themselves are commonly called bisexual or, ironically for this discussion, “perfect”. A single plant that has both male flowers and female flowers, either simultaneously or consecutively, is called monoecious, not hermaphroditic. A type of plant that has male flowers on one plant and female flowers on another is called dioecious, although any single plant of this kind is either androecious (male) or gynoecious (female). The flowers themselves are called unisexual, or “imperfect” in the case of angiosperms. Polygamous plants have both perfect and imperfect flowers on the same plant.
Since Sinema is not a plant, the use of the term bisexual is not ambiguous and does not imply that she is a flower that has both male and female reproductive structures. It is, after all, important to use the proper terms.