Media Kool-Aid® from Las Vegas

Remember this lesson from George Washington as the media sell an implausible and now falsified narrative.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

“So he gets about 400lbs of equipment up 30 floors, sets up a concealed sniper nest, disarms fire alarms and other security systems in a casino, removed a window that’s 800lb of hurricane proof glass, then for 10 minutes rained down aimed firepower, all with no training whatsoever, and with no motive!” That comes from a doubter of the official version of what happened in Las Vegas on 1 October 2017. But you won’t hear that from the media.

The media promote the official narrative

Does it not amaze you America that in administration after administration there is some major crime spree from a “lone wolf” that calls for more gun control measures? Columbine, Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, Denver Movie theatre, Navy Ship Yard, San Bernardino, Las Vegas etc…

The established media, which is bought and paid for, as well as controlled by the CIA, and that 94% of the American people claim that they do not believe, tells them that another “Lone wolf” did the unthinkable. The criminal politicians then gather together only to never let a good “crisis go to waste.”

Criminal Hillary Clinton (Why has she not been prosecuted yet?) said, that we must put politics aside and immediately called for gun control.

Remember the armed guards that she has around her at all times protecting her from you, America?

Pope Francis calls it a senseless tragedy while stating,

People who manufacture weapons or invest into weapons industries are hypocrites if they call themselves Christians.

Remember the armed guards that he has around him at all times protecting him from you?

And the list goes on….

Yet, those that work for “We the people” want to disarm you? How does that work? Let me show you….

All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party. – Mao Tze Tung, Nov 6, 1938

How ironic that those who are calling for gun control are those who want the guns so they can have the control.

Criminal mayors

It is of interest to the American people to take note of those who they entrust to serve them. We are a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Yet, time and time again in this country we have leaders in government who put on the guise of “patriot” and then turn out to be the criminal in garb.

We learned in the past about the criminal acts of anti-gun mayors. We found that anti-gun mayors are criminals themselves, guilty as charged within their own ranks of such crimes as tax evasion, extortion, accepting bribes, child pornography, trademark counterfeiting, perjury, and one demigod mayor was even convicted of assaulting a police officer.

The crimes that these anti-gun mayors are convicted of suggests they are public enemies rather than public servants. No wonder they want to take guns from law-abiding citizens.

These politicians know that where the citizenry operates in the rights given to them without government interference, namely the right to bear arms, crime diminishes. With mud on their face, they know when they interfere with the right to bear arms, crime skyrockets.

What we see is that some of today’s politicians are magnifying the crimes they are placed in office to prevent.

They allow crime to be promoted through entertainment and when the crime is committed, they are there in hopes to grab the guns away.

This is exactly how criminals in government operate.

They demonize the gun, not the criminal.

Friends, this mentality is like blaming spoons for people being overweight, as if to say the act is apart from the actor.

History of gun control

Since criminal politicians refuse to look at history, which can be at the present our greatest teacher, it is very clear that gun banners know exactly what they are attempting to do – put the Second Amendment in the crosshairs.

Looking back, who has committed murder in the largest degree? Dictators Adolf Hilter, Mao Tze Tung, Josef Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, etc.

Time and time again, it has been a corrupt government that has been responsible for the mass murder of their own people under the deceptive guise of “gun control,” all of which the said dictators implemented.

Keep in mind these people promised their citizens protection and freedom upon the forfeiture of their guns.

How many times does history need to repeat itself?

Paralleling History

Let’s parallel history with the present ideology and methodology that those in the past blueprinted to implement gun control.

Mass murderer Adolf Hitler at a dinner talk on April 11, 1942 said:

The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country.

Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

Josef Stalin, the sole leader of the Soviet Union from 1924 to 1953, said:

If the opposition disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves.

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Mao Tze Tung, communist dictator of China said:

War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.

China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Further examples

Idi Amin, president of Uganda from 1971 to 1979, said:

I do not want to be controlled by any superpower. I myself consider myself the most powerful figure in the world, and that is why I do not let any superpower control me.

Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

Pol Pot, who created in Cambodia one of the 20th century’s most brutal and radical regimes, was responsible for killing one million of his own “educated,” yet unarmed citizens.

Conclusion:

Our forefathers did not arm the American people for the purpose of hunting, but rather to protect themselves from those who were doing the hunting, namely the tyrant King George.

The Second Amendment is only to vouchsafe our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and to ensure all of the other rights given unto us by our Creator.

The wisdom of the framers of the Constitution is found consistent with the lessons of the Bible they used as their bedrock for civil law. The people’s individual protection should always be a primary concern of government “of the people.”

In a righteous country, self-government reigns by the constraint of Christian morals.

The civil government that desires such a monopoly of force (i.e. they are the only ones with guns) is a threat to the lives, liberty, and property of its citizens, for that government ceases to be “of and for the people.”

George Washington, our first president, said:

From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good. (Luke 11:21)

| Website | + posts

Bradlee Dean is an ordained Christian preacher, Radio show host for the #1 show on Genesis Communication Network from 2-3 p.m. central standard (The Sons of Liberty), a National Tea Party favorite. He also speaks on high school and college campuses nationwide. Bradlee is also an author, a husband to one, daddy to four boys. You have probably seen Bradlee through such outlets as The New York Times, Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, The Weekly Standard etc.

3 Responses to Media Kool-Aid® from Las Vegas

  1. Eric Otness says:

    Fully agreed of the importance of the second amendment, and why gun control is a stupendously bad idea. Not sure if I particularly agree with the idea that the CIA controls the media, though…

    However, we do need to note that there are some particularly evil groups where the second amendment if anything made things worse. Take the Jacobins and the French Revolutionaries, for example: Given their views and what they professed to support (“Liberty, Equality, Brotherhood”), it’s unlikely they’d impose gun control, yet if anything, their freely distributing guns among everyone may have made things even worse. As Operation Parricide stated:

    “The “moderates” fared just as badly. Cities like Lyon, Toulon and Bordeaux, which were led by the Girondists against the Jacobins, were partially leveled and their inhabitants decimated. When the guillotining threatened to go too slowly, many victims were drowned and others were executed with shotguns, so that the crowds could revel in seeing them slowly bleed to death. (Napoleon, a Jacobin, and close friend of Robespierre, achieved his first victory by subduing “unruly” Toulon.)”

    Source: http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/Archives/Fidelity_archives/parricide.html

    And let’s not forget that the Cordeliers Club, which made even the Jacobins seem moderate by comparison, based a large amount of their views on the United States Constitution, which would include the Second Amendment.

  2. Terry A. Hurlbut says:

    True as far as that goes. But the idea of the Second Amendment is to make sure to arm everyone. So if any future Jacobins try any mischief, they meed enough resistance to make them back off. Remember the Japanese chief-of-staff who talked about guns behind every blade of grass.

  3. Eric Otness says:

    Agreed there, though we should also be wary of this bit that Ocelot implied when talking about a world without Gun Control in MGS4 (and the story ultimately promoted that as a good thing):

    https://youtu.be/zlPTJQF-3X0?t=75

    In particular, these dialogues:

    “Our father – Big Boss – sought to free himself from that chokehold. His dream was to create an army of free citizens, one that answered to no government… Outer Heaven. But he failed, because of you. Nine years ago, I tried to free us from the control of our genes. Four years later, our dear brother – Solidus – sought to free us from the control of the Patriots’ memes. All of that – all of it – was nothing more than a process of trial and error… The end result of which is Outer Haven. To be free from Sons of the Patriots, the ultimate form of external control imposed on the Patriots’ soldiers. Free from FOXDIE… Free from the System… Free from ID control. Our minds free from their prisons. That is the haven I’ve yearned for. […] This is only the beginning, Snake. America will descend into chaos… It’ll be the Wild West all over again. No law, no order. Fire will spread across the world. The people will fight… And through battle they will know the fullness of life. At last… Our father’s will… His Outer Heaven… Is complete.”

    Long story short, Ocelot advocated for “freedom” in line of the idea of the Wild West where there’s absolutely no law or order of any sort, and the system he took down, the Patriots, was a totalitarian AI system, and in fact for most of that game they had in place a system called the Sons of the Patriots System, which is basically another word for Gun Control. I’m a supporter of the second amendment in so far as we should have the ability to defend ourselves, but I won’t go as far in my support to advocate an anarchistic society where people kill each other for amusement.

    That’s another thing we need to take note of. Hope you guys can explain that bit and explain how to separate Ocelot’s talk from Second Amendment principles. I need something clear cut.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.