Swamp creatures expose themselves

Donald Trump has raised expectations. His State of the Union message satisifed some and raised others. To satisfy them, he must drain the swamp in and of the federal government itself. To make America great again he must re-establish the rule of law. Now he's taking a gamble--with tariffs.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Taking nothing away from Donald J. Trump in regards to his insight and intelligence, it would not surprise even his most ardent supporters to find out that the extent of the corruption and evil which is our Federal Government was not early on fully appreciated by our new President. He has discovered that the swamp is wider than the widest ocean and deeper than the deepest sea.

The swamp creatures rear up

The pre-election attacks on Trump were only the beginning. Recall the entire leftwing establishment declared that Trump hates all women. This lunacy was instigated because of his dislike for one nasty, fat slob of a garbage mouthed woman. Then prior to the inauguration Trump was vilified and deemed a hater of all the national security organizations after he announced that there were a few persons embedded in these groups who were operating ideologically and illegally. Shyster Schumer, apparently well versed in the operatives’ dirty deeds, threatened Trump with unspecified security agency retaliation.

Then began the pre-inauguration assault which has proven to be child’s play next to what The Donald is now encountering as he begins his struggle to make America Great Again. From every putrid corner and rat hole, the Deep State, which is most aptly described as leftwing loonies embedded by leftwing loony leaders, are doing all they can to disrupt President Trump’s agenda. As a direct result of fake leaks about administration officials and the more dangerous and destructive unauthorized leaks of national security issues, the path and direction Trump must take has now been set in stone.

Thanks to them he can do what has to be done

While it is a standard practice for new administrations to replace appointees from the previous crop of mostly unqualified trough dwellers, especially if those people were appointed by the opposition party, Donald Trump, up until this week had not done a wholesale house cleaning ala Clinton and Obama. Certainly and for sure any left-winger being asked to leave by Trump was going to cause a firestorm in the media. They were not happy just being part of the undermining of Trump’s agenda, they relished in nearly orgasmic pleasure while reporting on it. This then, is why the swamp creatures have done America such a big favor.

Because now it’s not just those in the new administration who know, the embedded remnants of past socialist administrations do as well. That klatch of ideologues posing as journalists also know. Gloating, chest pumping and the uncontrollable elation has been on display as the entire country and the world have witnessed the subversive activity of these traitors embedded in every department of the government. Only a fool or a masochist would venture on without a clean sweep. Or should we say a complete draining. The media will squeal like wild boars snared in a steel trap, the Democrats will cry foul and additional snowflakes will begin to melt, but the sane people of the world will rejoice as Trump does what needs to be done.

The civil service problem

Ambassadors have been ordered home, United States Attorneys have been removed, appointed positions have been repositioned, department heads have been metaphorically decapitated. Very soon, what will remain is the huge caste of Civil Service government employees. Over 90% of which have been hired by leftist administrations of the past. They have positions that could be used, and are in fact doing so at this very moment, to undermine this administration or at the very least interfere or impede it.

The problem Trump will face with these people might seem insurmountable since it takes years before anyone of these meal munchers of the government teat can be fired. The Civil Service Unions have managed to sign protective agreements with the our government whereby even people convicted of crimes cannot be easily removed.

They can’t be fired but they can be neutralized

Where to park a swamp creature to make him want to leaveSince Trump can’t fire these people and they won’t resign on their own, what is a President supposed to do? Here is a simple and very effective suggestion. While these people cannot be fired, they can be repositioned and relocated to any location and for any purpose that the Executive Branch deems necessary. Known trouble makers can all be removed from positions of authority and assigned to small offices where they would be stripped of their previous duties and would be impotent, at least as relates to insurgent activity.

It may seem like a waste of taxpayer funds to have people sitting, doing nothing and getting paid. That is until one realizes that, except for reading the newspaper and playing on line solitaire, nothing is pretty much what most of them do all day anyway. And when you consider the cost of trying to get them fired and the damage they could do to the flow of the administration policies if they are allowed to remain, setting them up in an remote office, some place comfortable, some place nice, someplace where they can’t poke their sticky fingers anywhere that would interfere with our government, this seems like a prudent venture and money well spent.

I hear that the Anwar Province in Northern Alaska is very nice, all year round.


Reprint from TPATH

4 Responses to Swamp creatures expose themselves

  1. ACA says:

    Exile to an American Siberia for dissidents.

    Wow, just wow.

    Imagine your response if anyone connected with the Obama administration had vaguely suggested something slightly resembling reassigning Federal employees who didn’t support him, and realize just how appalling your suggestion is.

    And citation, please, for your claim that 90% of Federal employees were hired by leftist administrations of the past… especially considering there was a huge Defense hiring boom under Reagan (myself included, and no, I’m not a Federal employee anymore. And before you jump to conclusions, I left 100% of my own volition.)

    • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

      We’ve got you nailed dead-to-rights. Whom do you think you’re kidding? Do you really expect us to believe the Obama administration did not do the very thing we freely avow suggesting the Trump administration do? Or would have, if any conservative “civil servants” were left?

      We are talking here about people deliberately and directly challenging the authority of the President in matters well within the President’s purview. We never asked you to tolerate that kind of thing during the Obama administration. Instead we worked our fundaments off to elect a more worthy successor to him than Hillary Clinton could ever be. And we did it, even though she claimed to have won the popular vote by three million votes – all of them dead or voting in more than one State, as we now learn.

      I go further than the author. I say we go back to the days of Andrew Jackson. “To the victor belong the spoils.” Make that victors – plural. We are the victors here. Get over it, and yourself.

  2. ACA says:

    Proof, Terry. Proof.

    Give me proof the Big Bad Barack did any such thing with civil servants.

    You would quote Andrew Jackson — another crude, vulgar, disgraceful man elected President.

    And the spoils system was eliminated by the Hatch Act.

    Do you support Larry Klayman’s proposal to imprison Trump opponents? http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/larry-klayman-will-be-jeff-sessions-hamburger-helper-to-help-him-put-the-evil-forces-of-the-left-in-prison/

    And by the way, I remember eight years, you insisted Obama would not leave office voluntarily. I offered you a wager — some sum of money, payable to a mutually agreed on charity, that he would. You refused, on the grounds that if Obama did leave office, the economy would be in such a state of ruin, the money would be worthless. Are you willing to admit you were wrong on both counts: that Obama did leave office voluntarily, and that the economy is still functioning well enough that the wager (I think I suggested five grand) is still a decent sum of money?

    • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

      I don’t have to offer you any proof at all. Because you distort everything anyway.

      Larry Klayman likely pointed out that many of those who actively work against President Trump, do so by unlawful means. Means that would mean prison for anyone else who used them.

      But you appear to have decided that Donald Trump is such a monster that any means against him would be automatically lawful, because one uses them against him.

      In which event you and I have nothing further to discuss.

      I will accept no further comment from you on this thread. If you make one, consider it trashed.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.