Globalist false choices
Over the last several years, the citizens of the United States have become increasingly concerned about globalist cabals conspiring to decimate the sovereignty of our beloved nation. Some of the concerns can be attributed to paranoia but other concerns are more than justified – especially for students of end time prophecies that understand the eventuality of a one world government and recognize the beginning of its fulfillment. For this group it is not a question of whether or not a globalist regime exists, it is a question of how far has it developed. While I have tried my best to maintain objectivity and a certain degree of level-headedness regarding this matter, my research as a result of the presidential campaigns have opened a Pandora’s Box that I can no longer close.
I first studied the relationship between Mystery Babylon and the New World Order (NWO) more than several years ago. I also had a rudimentary understanding of the roles the United Nations, World Bankers, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission would have in bringing this NWO into existence. What I didn’t understand was the progress that was being made right under our very noses.
Donald Trump tips his hand
My recent interest in this area was piqued during the recent Republican debates when Donald Trump declared that he would appoint Richard N. Haas as his Foreign Policy Advisor. Although I couldn’t quite place it, that name sounded familiar, so I began to research and found out that Haas has many accomplishments, including being the President of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Of course this disturbed me, but not quite as much as what I was to subsequently learn. It seems the American system of representative government has been under attack since 1913, when Marxist E.M. House, Chief Advisor to President Wilson, made an attempt to surrender our sovereignty to the now defunct League of Nations. Fortunately, the Senate blocked House’s attempt. But House didn’t give up. In 1921 he formed the CFR, which grew in membership and power but never quite met House’s expectations. While the CFR still exists as a type of clearing house of sorts, its ability to achieve globalism in something other than the intellectual realm has been unfruitful. There were other groups that shared House’s vision, such as the Bilderbergs and the Illuminati, but none were as successful as the current Trilateral Commission.
The Trilateral Commission has proven to be the pot of gold at the end of the globalists’ rainbow. It boasts of a long list of who’s who in politics, media, banking, education, and even in ecumenical circles. This power group was founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, Lyndon B. Johnson’s counselor and Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor. Other recognizable names include Henry Kissinger, Richard Nixon, Madeleine Albright, Timothy Geitner, as well as the Clintons, George H.W. Bush and the Cheney’s, as well as Alan Greenspan and Paul Volker, Michael Bloomberg, and Mitt Romney. The extensive list includes Republicans and Democrats alike and would take up pages of text to document properly.
Who are the Trilateral Commission?
So you may be wondering what is the mission of the Trilateral Commission. On their website they describe it this way:
The Trilateral Commission is a non-governmental, policy-oriented discussion group of about 390 distinguished citizens from Europe, North America, and Pacific Asia formed to encourage understanding and closer cooperation among these three regions on shared global problems.
That may seem altruistic, but not all that glitters is gold. It also describes its goals this way:
Growing interdependence is a fact of life of the contemporary world. It transcends and influences national systems. It requires new and more intensive forms of international cooperation to realize its benefits and to counteract economic and political nationalism.
Eric Barger, in “The New World Order Under Clinton: Establishment Insiders and Political Deceit” in the Christian World Report, May 1993, pg. 7, stated:
The Trilateral Commission was founded to become the international progeny of the CFR, with its goal to align the free world with the advanced communist states to organize a world government.
The Trilateral Commission’s website also includes a quote by the late Kiichi Miyazawa, former Japanese Prime Minister, a founding member of the Trilateral Commission, and a former Acting Chairman of the Japanese Group (now Pacific Asian Group). He said:
…[D]iscussions within the Commission do affect the thinking of our governments and in some cases—although indirectly—their policy decisions. In this sense, I believe that the Commission has made a difference—even if a number of crucial problems, trade relations for example, still exist among the trilateral countries.
For those living in North and Central America, NAFTA and CAFTA are the products of the Trilateral Commission, which seeks to blur national borders and consequently national distinctions of all kinds. This is perhaps why Mr. Trump, an active member of the CFR, has fallen from their graces and is now feeling the ire of their favorite sons in the establishment.
Co-Founding member, Zbigniew Brzezinski, in his 1971 book, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, stated:
The nation-state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.
Or so he hoped. Brzezinski and Rockefeller intended that the Commission be the llluminati’s attempt to unite Western Europe’s common market Japan, Canada and the United States into an economic and political confederacy through an economic approach. Nationalism or patriotism has no place in this globalist strategy.
In a 1991 speech by David Rockefeller at the Trilateral Commission meeting, Rockefeller stated:
We are grateful to The Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.
Paranoia aside, based on this statement alone there can be little doubt that the Trilateral Commission seeks to render national sovereignty extinct in favor of a NWO and a New International Economic Order under the control of elitist conspirators.
Senator Barry Goldwater was one of the first to recognize the danger to our national security at the hands of the Trilateral Commission. Goldwater called it: “a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical… [in] the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved.” Goldwater, Barry; coauthored with Stephen Shadegg (1980). With No Apologies. Berkley. p. 299. ISBN 0-425-04663-X.
The Globalist Bush Family
In his 1989 inaugural speech, George H.W. Bush, a committed globalist and member of the Trilateral Commission, spoke fondly of a thousand points of light. He described this metaphor as symbolizing all the community organizations that shined throughout the nation. It all sounded wonderful. But once again, all that glitters is not gold and these pleasant-sounding words hid a globalist agenda that an unsuspecting nation accepted with open arms. The kindly and gentlemanly President Bush also subjected us to global power in Agenda 21, a globalist plot to deprive us of our property rights under the guise of environmental sustainability supported by the concept of global warming. This initiative is supported and funded in the United States by the Ford Foundation, also founding member of the Trilateral Commission.
According to the official Trilateral Commission membership lists, there are only eighty-seven members from the United States. Twelve percent of the Commission’s US membership were made by Obama appointments within the first 10 days of his Administration. In addition to Timothy Geithner, they include Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, National Security Advisor; Gen. James L. Jones; Deputy National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon; Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee, Paul Volker; Director of National Intelligence, Admiral Dennis C. Blair; Assistant Secretary of State, Asia & Pacific, Kurt M. Campbell; Deputy Secretary of State, James Steinberg; State Department, Special Envoy, Richard Haas (Donald Trump’s guy who is also an Obama guy); State Department, Special Envoy, Dennis Ross; and State Department, Special Envoy, Richard Holbrooke.
So, is there hope for a nation that values its sovereignty and its government by the people, of the people and for the people? Perhaps Donald Trump, who recently mentioned Richard Haas as his possible Foreign Policy Advisor, has refused to march lockstep with this cabal’s goals of obliterating national boundaries. Perhaps this is the reason why Trilateral member extraordinaire, Mitt Romney, excoriated the presidential candidate. Perhaps it is why those entrenched in the GOP establishment’s ruling class will do all within their power to annihilate the Trump campaign. Or perhaps it is just a ploy to make us poor serfs think that we actually have a choice. Truthfully, we will never know. And just in case you may be thinking that Ted Cruz is a better choice, think again, Heidi Cruz is a member of the CFR’s Task Force, as well as being well-connected to world bankers for her entire career.
To be honest, the situation is bad. However, it is not hopeless. While the Bible clearly speaks about a NWO, it also speaks of the Church of Philadelphia that fares better than the other churches in the Book. Isn’t it interesting that our Constitution was birthed in the City of Philadelphia? Perhaps that’s not a coincidence. And perhaps this can serve as a wakeup call that if we want to reclaim our nation, then looking to either political party is unwise and unrealistic. As for me, I’ll be doing all I can to support the Constitution Party, and maybe if fellow patriots do likewise, in our next presidential campaign we just may have a choice that is not in bed with the globalists and their nation-destroying agenda. Or perhaps I should say that we may have a choice other than Trilateralist #1, or Trilateralist #2. Unfortunately, developing choice takes a strong personal constitution, in addition to the one ratified on September 17, 1787. That may prove to be either the cause of our downfall or the cause of our survival.
Additionally, if you consider yourself to be a patriotic person of faith, then I also suggest you send letters, requests of all kinds, and encourage others in a position of influence to contact Rep. Scott Garret (R) NJ to honor a recent request that he sponsor a bill to repeal the 1954 Johnson Amendment that stripped the church of its voice under threat of losing its tax exempt status. In this fight for the soul of America, the church can be a nuclear arsenal of power, but not if they remain silent and therefore inconsequential. Frankly, we need all the help we can get, and that includes the voice of the church, as well as strong and determined patriots. If we don’t stand now while it is still day, standing tomorrow just may be an exercise in futility.