If America knew her history

The Constitution, which sets forth the principle of rule of law, defines what is unconstitutional, and guarantees freedom of speech and other liberties of a Constitutional republic, and also describes the impeachment power. (How many know of the Jewish roots of this document?) Hypocrisy threatens Constitutional government. Could Israel use a constitution like this? More to the point: would a Convention of States save it, or destroy it? (Example: civil asset forfeiture violates the Constitution.) Quick fixes like Regulation Freedom Amendments weaken it. Furthermore: the Constitution provides for removing, and punishing, a judge who commits treason in his rulings. Furthermore, opponents who engage in lawfare against an elected President risk breaking the Constitution.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

The sacred rights of mankind are not to be rummaged for, among old parchments, or musty records. They are written, as with a sun beam in the whole volume of human nature, by the hand of the divinity itself; and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power.

– Alexander Hamilton, 1775

Last week, concerning the topic of immigration, Politico did its best in attempting to “erase” and “obscure” all knowledge of the U.S. Constitution by helping spread more propaganda for this criminal administration.

No stopping Obama?

Politico reported:

Even if President Barack Obama tests the bounds of his presidential power with the big, unilateral moves he’s promising on immigration, there may be no way to stop him.

Lawyers (who swear to the bar) are debating the legality of a series of immigration-related executive actions the White House is reportedly considering. …

“The court route: I don’t see it,” said Jan Ting, a top immigration official under President George H.W. Bush who opposes Obama’s expected moves.

Notice here, friends, that there is no reference to constitutional law in these contrived articles whatsoever. So, once again, we can clearly see that it is mere opinion that they’re reporting and not facts based on our Constitution.

As it has rightly been said,

If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they do not have to give you the right answers.

Propaganda…

If Americans knew their history, it would take more than this signature to make law.

Official signature of the de facto President on the Obamacare law. Photo: Chuck Kennedy/The White House

Let’s dissect this propaganda a bit here. The article said Obama “tests the bounds of his presidential power,” and then said that there is “no way to stop him.”

First, I did not know that it was the president’s duty to violate the Constitution he swore an oath to uphold. Second, we are talking about illegal immigrants here; therefore, it is unconstitutional. Because of this, what the president is attempting to do is illegal. Third, “The court route: I don’t see it.” Neither do I! Therefore, it does not need court litigation when in fact it is an illegal unconstitutional act in the first place!

So then, from whence are these reporters and lawyers deriving their information, when they believe that the president can do whatever he wants to, when he wants to do it? Through reporters’ ignorance and stupidities, justice has been delayed concerning the illegal policies and actions by this government. Why? Because of the people’s lack of knowledge (Hosea 4:6) of the enumerated laws in the Constitution of the United States (Article III, Section 3).

Then on the other hand, you have Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, playing the fool for this fool in office and attempting to support this dictatorship by saying things like, “It is time for Obama to do whatever the h–l he wants,” concerning illegal immigration.

Furthermore, because the media report it, the people concede that the president can do whatever he wants to do. As if to say that he is above the law – when in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

To Sheila Jackson Lee I say, it’s a terrible place to be when your brain is in someone else’s head.

…and history

Friends,

There is no greater tyranny, than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice.

(Montesquieu)

Can you imagine if the American people really knew their history?

America would realize that her founders did not tolerate these tyrannical usurpations whatsoever. Case and point: The Declaration of Independence is the very document our forefathers used to throw off tyranny in every form.

Thomas Jefferson, who was one of the architects and a signer of the Declaration of Independence, stated, “[Bear] always in mind that a nation ceases to be republican only when the will of the majority ceases to the law. …”

Apparently, America is still in need of a history lesson. A lesson that will be a hard one to learn. That is, if the nation continues down the road it is on now.

Video: If we did not receive our rights from government, then government cannot take them away!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18Hq5xeIm_8

Listen to Bradlee Dean on The Sons of Liberty radio six days a week here! (www.SonsOfLibertyRadio.com)

<a href="https://www.sodahead.com/united-states/if-america-knew-her-history/question-4435209/" title="If America knew her history">If America knew her history</a>

[subscribe2]

| Website | + posts

Bradlee Dean is an ordained Christian preacher, Radio show host for the #1 show on Genesis Communication Network from 2-3 p.m. central standard (The Sons of Liberty), a National Tea Party favorite. He also speaks on high school and college campuses nationwide. Bradlee is also an author, a husband to one, daddy to four boys. You have probably seen Bradlee through such outlets as The New York Times, Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, The Weekly Standard etc.

8 Responses to If America knew her history

  1. […] If America knew her history […]

  2. Fergus Mason says:

    “Can you imagine if the American people really knew their history?”

    Would that be ALL your history, or just the bit about how your ancestors moved to a new continent and stole it from the people who already lived there?

    • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

      What rights do nomads have, or recognize?

      Part of the problem was that some of them (like the Mohawks) behaved in a brutal fashion from the first contact. Others (like the Iroquois Federation) took the wrong side in the American War for Independence. After that, American Presidents tended to generalize. Perhaps they shouldn’t have done that.

      In any case, we deal here with a (de facto) President who now behaves very much like someone who rose to call himself “The Leader” of your adopted country. So that bit of “history” you bring up now is incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial.

  3. Fergus Mason says:

    “Part of the problem was that some of them (like the Mohawks) behaved in a brutal fashion from the first contact.”

    Kind of like the self-appointed “militias” in the cheap XXXXXXL camouflage uniforms patrolling the Mexican border with their AR15 knockoffs?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.