Vexatious liberal ‘lexicons’
Over the years, as part of the planned ruination of our culture and society the liberal left has endeavored to label and define activity, by use of words they choose and phrases they create. All the while, our side, acquiesces and accepts and even uses those terms and then wonders why they always lose the propaganda battle.
Liberal words and phrases: some examples
This may be one of the most irritating and misleading liberal slogans being used everyday and accepted by those being targeted by it. The nefarious inference here is that those who have earned or created enough wealth to give charitably, have somehow, by odious or unscrupulousness activity, acquired that wealth from their victims and hence, need to give it back.
Giving back is something one does if caught taking what is not his. What giving actually is, is those working and earning something are taking some of those earnings and giving it to those who have not earned it, nor have they ever had it taken or stolen from them.
Conservatives, by astronomical amounts, give more of what they have earned to those in need than the liberal side of the donation spectrum. This is a fact as well as it is a fact that liberals would much prefer to give to those who have not earned it from the pockets of those who have. Provided of course it comes not from their pockets.
It is time those giving what is theirs, to help those receiving it, cease allowing this term to be used. It not only degrades the giver but also degrades the charitable nature of that which is being given. If the next time you see the term Giving Back on a donation or charity event form, before you send your check, use a maker and x-out the back word. Unless of course you have stolen what you are returning.
While it may be true that most progressive leftist politicians love this word and its concept, it is also true, they hide from it. Those who espouse Marxism and follow that manifesto, such as the “Forger in the White House”, push policies which confiscate what others have earned and secretly love the term Redistribution of Wealth, even as they publicly deny that is what they are doing.
Why did Marx use that term? It’s quite simple. It is used, as is required to build and hold onto power, to create separation, envy, covetousness and malignity between the so-called classes.
For things such as money, property or other forms of wealth to be re-distributed, it must first have been distributed. Clearly that indicates it wasn’t earned or created. It was distributed to some and not to others. The only recourse then would be to redistribute it, more fairly.
Its time we stopped using this leftist term and began calling it what it is, confiscation and disbursement.
Common sense gun laws
When you hear this term being used by politicians and law makers, you had better check for the latest shredding of our Constitution. As with every bill or law that slithers out of state and national legislative sessions, whatever they name it, for sure, it will represent exactly the opposite. Case in point, “The Affordable Health Care Act”.
These heavy thinkers consider it Common Sense to announce that no one in schools or public places will be armed and able to stop mass killings. And that those who may be planning to slaughter people, will carry out their attack in a location where there are armed defenders. After all, it’s just common sense that if no guns are allowed no one will commit a crime with one. Makes one feel so safe and snugly.
Who could argue that restricting magazine capacity for law-abiding citizens is anything but Common Sense? With these laws working to protect us, no self-respecting terrorist, drug cartel member or homicidal maniac would take advantage of their victims by flouting magazine capacity laws.
These of course a just a few examples of legislative “Common Sense”. It appears that Common Sense is not very Common anymore.
Reprinted from Tea Party Advocacy Tracking Hub