Constitution and citizenship challenge

The Constitution, which sets forth the principle of rule of law, defines what is unconstitutional, and guarantees freedom of speech and other liberties of a Constitutional republic, and also describes the impeachment power. (How many know of the Jewish roots of this document?) Hypocrisy threatens Constitutional government. Could Israel use a constitution like this? More to the point: would a Convention of States save it, or destroy it? (Example: civil asset forfeiture violates the Constitution.) Quick fixes like Regulation Freedom Amendments weaken it. Furthermore: the Constitution provides for removing, and punishing, a judge who commits treason in his rulings. Furthermore, opponents who engage in lawfare against an elected President risk breaking the Constitution.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

For many months now we have listened as Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and many other conservative talk show hosts banter on and on about our precious Constitution. They advertise colleges such as Hillsdale and push books espousing the need to know, understand and abide by those founding documents. That is, until members of their audience actually do.

Glenn Beck, Before we go any further it is important that our readers understand that TPATH holds no grudge against any of those mentioned above. They have their reasons for ignoring parts of the Constitution. All of these men are doing great work in other areas, especially Glenn Beck. Only they know why they have chosen to look the other way, to ignore or even worse, belittle a very large portion of those who tune into their shows every day.

They may be serving a self interest in employment or revenue from advertisers, advancement in growth of their businesses or even worse, they may well have had their families threatened. No one can doubt that threats coming from this administration had better be treated as credible. There is already a trail of dead journalists and bloggers who may have not heeded such warnings.

Constitution, eligibility and forgery

Will you stand for the Constitution?If you have not guessed yet, we are referencing two very vital issues concerning the Usurper in the White House. Those issues are eligibility and crimes of forgery. At this point, for our readers, its not necessary to list all the facts which prove beyond any doubt that Obama forged or caused to be forged a birth certificate nor is there any real need to delve into Article I of the Constitution, the Federalist Papers and letters between Jefferson and John Jay concerning exactly what they meant by the term Natural Born Citizen.

Mark has referenced callers as “one of those” if someone brings it up and Glenn has called them “fringe, fringe, fringe”. So, what is the challenge? What is the dare, the double dare?

Since TPATH does not pay for anything that Mark Levin does we will leave him out of this dare. But Glenn Beck, on the other hand, we do much for. We have his radio show, The Blaze, and the Glenn Beck cable and internet show prominently linked on TPATH and we are a fully paid subscriber. So as he likes to say, TPATH is helping to build his network.

As we discussed before, Glenn has claimed to have debunked all the “birther” issues, which of course he has not. It was very clear, that his debunking was not much more than his own feelings about the issue and it was even more clear that he has never taken the time to look at the Cold Case Posse’s evidence produced by Mike Zullo.

Before we define our challenge it is important to understand that Glenn has reluctantly but vaguely admitted that the birth certificate Obama presented to the world on the White House website, which puts it in the jurisdiction of Washington DC, may have been done as a distraction and that Obama actually loves this birther talk.

Of course all of us who know all the facts about this man’s hidden past, know different.  Suppose, Glenn is correct. What Obama or his people have done is a crime. It is illegal to fabricate and present a forged government document as authentic. This crime is punishable by 10 years in Federal Prison.

We present to you below the wording of the forgery laws as presented by one of the most reputable Law Offices in Washington, DC.

Jamison Koehler, Attorney-at-law

Washington, DC

Forgery

Elements of the Offense

Forgery is committed in Washington, D.C. when a person (1) makes, draws, or utters (2) a forged written instrument (3) with intent to defraud or injure another.

To “utter” means to “issue, authenticate, transfer, publish, sell, deliver, transmit, present, display, use, or certify.” Or more simply, as Black’s Law Dictionary suggests, it involves putting the instrument into circulation in some manner.

A “written instrument” includes a check, stamp, letter of credit, piece of money, stock certificate, money order or traveler’s check. In a sense, it can be any document that has monetary value or affects legal relations between two parties.

The third element – “intent to defraud or injure another” – provides the criminal intent (or “mens rea”) required to make out the offense. While a judge or jury cannot read the defendant’s mind, the prosecution can make out this element of the crime through circumstantial evidence.
D.C. Code 22-3241.

Penalties

There are three different penalty levels for forgery depending on the nature of the “written instrument” that is forged or uttered. If the instrument is money, a commercial paper (e.g., bond or check), a legal document (e.g., deed or will), or any document worth $10,000 or more, the penalty is a maximum fine of $10,000 and/or imprisonment for up to 10 years.

If this law does not describe what Obama and/or his people have done, would anything?  And another point, are our talk show hosts comfortable with America becoming Animal Farm, where some pigs are more equal than others? Or should we say where some pigs are allowed to break laws that other critters are serving prison time for?

All of us who visit and read the Blaze everyday are aware of the brilliant, funny and very thoughtful comments the Blaze readers leave and many times the Blaze will put up a poll on a particular subject.

Here is the double dare. Glenn, put up a poll asking your readers a question. Let’s find out what percentage of your readers are “fringe, fringe, fringe”

Note to Blaze readers: As you know there has been much written about Obama’s eligibility under the Constitution to be president and that evidence is mounting that the birth certificate he offered as proof of being born in Hawaii has been manipulated or even forged.

CHOSE ONE:
Would you like to see these issues investigated by Congress?

Or

Would you like to see these issued dropped and ignored?

TPATH is quite certain our emails to Glenn and his staff will be deleted or filtered but if any of you who would like to see this poll taken by his readers please feel free to post this question on his blogs or email this article to him.

For awhile TPATH had been receiving responses from Glenn’s staff, on several issues, but recently, nothing. So any help we can get from our readers asking him to post this poll, would be appreciated.

Reprinted from Tea Party Advocacy Tracking Hub

[subscribe2]

2 Responses to Constitution and citizenship challenge

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.