Homosexuality: Political Battering Ram

Attacks on liberty in our schools - common Core and other global initiatives put a worm into this apple, producing students who do not think. Here's another worm: when teachers take a prey from among their own students. Not to mention a teacher who prostitutes herself to a corrupt seller of offices. Or an anti-bullying campaign that pulls a cruel humanitarian hoax by replacing one kind of bullying with another.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Here an open homosexual admit the goals of her movement:

I believe granting liberty to gay people advances a compelling government interest, that such an interest cannot be adequately advanced if “pockets of resistance” to a societal statement of equality are permitted to flourish, and hence that a law that permits no individual exceptions based on religious beliefs will be the least restrictive means of achieving the goal of liberty for gay people. – Chai Feldblum, an open Lesbian who was nominated to serve as a Commissioner of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by Barack Hussein Obama

The lid has yet again blown off the radical homosexual agenda. As the Supreme Court held hearings on the Defense of Marriage Act and Proposition 8, Obama spent $350 million on sexual indoctrination classes for children. The timing is impeccable.

A new kind of “sex ed”

Homosexual influence in schools is everything you heard it was, and worse.

A worm in the apple?

Through the Personal Responsibility Education Program, students will be taught that no type of sex is wrong and the only “unsafe” behavior is becoming pregnant.

(Editor’s Note: Here is a direct link to certain advertisements from the Advertising Council, that are part of this campaign. Warning: these advertisements treat a sensitive subject in a manner that better befits “Porno Night” at the Yale Law School Film Society. Parental judgment and discretion are advised.)

One can look to New York City, who implemented a similar type of sexual indoctrination on NYC schools in 2011. This curriculum is taught to grades 5, 8, and 10, which students receive standardized testing on.

ARVE Error: need id and provider

Here are some examples of their twisted curriculum:

  • High-school students go to stores and jot down condom brands, prices and features such as lubrication.
  • Teens research a route from school to a clinic that provides birth control and STD tests, and write down its confidentiality policy. (Interesting, I will say that again – they are to write down the confidentiality policy. Did you hear that parents?)
  • Kids ages 11 and 12 sort “risk cards” to rate the safety of various activities, including “intercourse using a condom and an oil-based lubricant,’’ mutual masturbation, French kissing, oral sex, and anal sex.
  • Teens are referred to resources such as Columbia University’s website Go Ask Alice, which explores topics like “doggie-style” and other positions, “sadomasochistic sex play,” phone sex, oral sex with braces, fetishes, porn stars, vibrators and bestiality. (see Exodus 22:19 and 1 Corinthians 6:9-10)

(Editor’s Note: Not even parental judgment and discretion advice would mitigate a direct link to that kind of “resource.”)

Do not those that developed this curriculum belong in jail?

Within a year after this perversion was implemented, an article came out in The Wall Street Journal which revealed cases of sexual misconduct by teachers, and that the teachers’ unions were protecting the teachers who received little to no consequence for their crimes against children.

For example, teacher William Scharbach was found to have inappropriately touched and held young boys. “Respondent’s actions at best give the appearance of impropriety and at worst suggest pedophilia,” wrote the arbitrator, the fox in the chicken coop who was hired by the union to protect the union, before giving the teacher only a reprimand. The teacher didn’t deny the touching but denied that it was inappropriate. This is criminal!

Dan Savage, Radical Homosexual

Also coinciding with the radical push for sexual deviancy upon America’s children, we cannot forget about Dan Savage, a radical homosexual who dared God’s justice by authoring a book titled Skipping Towards Gomorrah. Savage uses the guise of anti-bullying with his Obama-endorsed organization “It Gets Better” – which is nothing but an attempt to normalize homosexuality. Savage attacked the Bible and bullied Christian teens at a high school journalism conference. Yes, I said high school.

It was reported that the first thing the bully said was, “I hope you’re all using birth control,” that the Bible was “bulls—”, and then spewed out sexual innuendos during his speech. The bully also set an atmosphere of hostility towards Christians who espouse beliefs that he was literally taking on himself – he was attacking students while crying “victim”. More than 100 students stood up and walked out of his derogatory, perverted, deranged, vulgar, and backward-meaning speech.

If Dan is not licking doorknobs in hopes that others get sick with the flu, then he (and his husband) is a guest at the White House for President Obama’s 2011 LGBT Pride Month reception, as well as attendees at the White House anti-bullying conference.

Keep in mind this is the same president who overlooked the Ice investigation into the Pentagon (5000 Pentagon employees were investigated for child pornography), who appointed over 225 homosexuals and transvestites into key positions in government (including Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, who “queerified” Harvard),

ARVE Error: need id and provider

and who appointed as a safe school czar Kevin Jennings who wrote the forward to a book titled, Queering Elementary Education. (LINK) Jennings’ hero was Harry Hay, an icon for NAMBLA (North American Man and Boy Love Association) whose motto is “sex before 8 before it’s too late” when marching in gay pride parades.

The NEA has worked hand in glove with this agenda as well. They already had an LGBT caucus for teachers, but in 2010 felt it necessary to celebrate a new caucus: the “drag queen” caucus. The NEA also refused to pass Amendment I-24, designed to protect students from sexual misconduct by teachers. Many feel they refused to pass the amendment in order to protect teachers who have sex with students.

No wonder this bully felt so emboldened to attack a bunch of high school students, and right under the noses of their parents.

Dan Savage is also the same radical homosexual who said on HBO he wished all republicans were “f—ing dead.” In 2006, Savage said that a particular candidate for Senate “should be dragged behind a pickup truck until there’s nothing left but the rope,” which, by the way, stands contrary to the radical homosexual agenda’s premise for hate crimes legislation.

ARVE Error: need id and provider

He also said on Bill Maher’s show,

I sometimes think about f—ing the s— out of Santorum. I think he needs it. Let’s bone that Santorum. I’m up for whipping up some Santorum in Santorum.

Savage also once claimed “the only thing stopping his d**k from being put in Brad Pitt’s mouth is a piece of paper”, speaking of legislation. Did you catch that? I thought he was married. Out of his own mouth, he just admitted that “homosexual rights” is not about marriage; it is about promiscuity. He contradicts himself at every turn, my friends.

If the president and homosexual lobby went out to prove my point they could have not done a better job. In concert, these two radicals are clearly and literally at war with God and America, as you know it.

The radicals are now operating in the light of day what they used to do through deceptive measures.

The American people have found out the radical homosexual agenda’s every deception through their “civil rights” cry, their “hate crimes” cry, and now their “bullying” cry. At every turn their false premise is discovered.

People have seen clearly, after Savage’s demonstration, their version of tolerance and love – it is quite the opposite. Attack and then cry victim is their face for the world to see. It is bigotry to the fullest – hate and intolerance towards anyone who resists their perversion.

America must come to the very realization that this agenda undermines everything we are. People like Dan Savage used to be jailed for their perversion, now they are hailed by this corrupt administration. When paralleling the actions of the radical homosexuals such as the Dan Savages of the world to the actions of our founders, we now understand why God calls it an abomination.

America, it’s time for you to learn from history, so it does not repeat itself. We can even look to Canada, who implemented homosexual marriage in 2005, and see the moral devastation.

ARVE Error: need id and provider

It is clear to see that, unbeknownst to the average homosexual, the radical homosexual agenda is being used as a political battering ram to target our children and silence anyone who opposes their deviant and criminal behavior in an attempt to demoralize and enslave the American people.

John Adams, the second President of these Untied States, said,

Our Constitution is made for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

Charles Carroll, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, reminds us that

Without morals a republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure (and) which insures to the good eternal happiness, are undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the duration of free governments.

Who is Bradlee Dean?

ARVE Error: need id and provider

[subscribe2]

| Website | + posts

Bradlee Dean is an ordained Christian preacher, Radio show host for the #1 show on Genesis Communication Network from 2-3 p.m. central standard (The Sons of Liberty), a National Tea Party favorite. He also speaks on high school and college campuses nationwide. Bradlee is also an author, a husband to one, daddy to four boys. You have probably seen Bradlee through such outlets as The New York Times, Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, The Weekly Standard etc.

13 Responses to Homosexuality: Political Battering Ram

  1. Karma says:

    “homosexuals thinking themselves superior to the rest of us, precisely because they are homosexual.” That’s just too funny. I guess you haven’t noticed that _equality_ is a major theme for GBLT folks.

    • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

      Calling a tail a leg doesn’t make the name fit. Play the videos for yourself. Follow some of the links. You’ll find that equality is not what they want. The male homosexuals maintain they are the genetic superiors of their fellow men. (The female homosexuals, on the other hand, are out to recruit the Neo-Amazon Army.)

  2. Fergus Mason says:

    “Here an open homosexual admit the goals of her movement”

    The goals she’s talking about are liberty and equality. What’s wrong with that? At least one of them is in the Bill of Rights, I do believe.

    • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

      You don’t grasp the full implications. It also refers to banishing those who don’t approve of homosexuality from society. It’s not equality they seek, but superiority. They hope to win, and keep, a permanent social-cliquish pull.

  3. Fergus Mason says:

    “It also refers to banishing those who don’t approve of homosexuality from society.”

    Actually no, it doesn’t. It talks about not permitting pockets of resistance to equality. The emphasis on equality doesn’t really support your argument, I’d have thought.

    I also note that Bradlee Dean isn’t quite telling the whole story in his complaints about sex education. For example he says that Go Ask Alice “explores bestiality.” It does indeed, but it certainly doesn’t endorse it. In fact it gives lots of reasons for NOT doing it. I can’t actually see why he objects to that.

    • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

      “Not permitting pockets of resistance”? That sounds like enforcing philosophical (and in this case, anti-religious) notions by armed force. Are you really sure you want to give even the appearance of supporting that?

  4. Fergus Mason says:

    “That sounds like enforcing philosophical (and in this case, anti-religious) notions by armed force.”

    It could be taken that way and I don’t personally agree with the choice of words. I doubt it was meant that way though. The general message from gay rights activists is that they don’t want people to be able to get exceptions from anti-discrimination laws, and I’m fine with that.

    “Are you really sure you want to give even the appearance of supporting that?”

    I would not support the use of armed force against people who insisted on acting like bigots. I would simply have them arrested if their behaviour crossed the line between disapproval – which I couldn’t care less about – and victimisation.

    Personally I wouldn’t make it illegal for, say, hotel owners to bar gay couples, as happened in the UK a couple of years ago. I think it’s a despicable way to act, but it shouldn’t be forbidden. The market will take care of that without the law getting involved. Harassment of gays, though, should be as illegal as harassment of anyone else.

    • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

      Here is the problem with anti-discrimination laws: they constrain private behavior.

      It’s one thing to forbid a police officer or a judge to treat a man or woman differently under the law on account of what they do in private. Thus, if one person initiates violence against another, the initiator is guilty before the law, and the police may not excuse him on the basis of who his target might have been.

      It’s quite another to forbid a private business to refuse custom as their conscience, or animus, or whatever other motive, might dictate.

      Freedom of association includes freedom not to associate. Freedom to trade includes the freedom not to trade.

      And for that reason, “not wanting people to get exceptions from anti-discrimination laws” is not fine. Ever.

      For that is the true aim of an anti-discrimination law: to say, for example, that a wedding photographer may not refuse custom to roommates wishing to grant their relationship a dignity that the photographer feels, for whatever reason, they don’t deserve.

  5. Fergus Mason says:

    “It’s quite another to forbid a private business to refuse custom as their conscience, or animus, or whatever other motive, might dictate.”

    Oh, I agree. As I said, the market is perfectly capable of sorting out that issue. Frankly, if I were gay and wanted to get married, and found that the photographer was getting stroppy, I’d rather give my money to someone else anyway.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.