The Constitution, which sets forth the principle of rule of law, defines what is unconstitutional, and guarantees freedom of speech and other liberties of a Constitutional republic, and also describes the impeachment power. (How many know of the Jewish roots of this document?) Hypocrisy threatens Constitutional government. Could Israel use a constitution like this? More to the point: would a Convention of States save it, or destroy it? (Example: civil asset forfeiture violates the Constitution.) Quick fixes like Regulation Freedom Amendments weaken it. Furthermore: the Constitution provides for removing, and punishing, a judge who commits treason in his rulings. Furthermore, opponents who engage in lawfare against an elected President risk breaking the Constitution. The Constitution, which sets forth the principle of rule of law, defines what is unconstitutional, and guarantees freedom of speech and other liberties of a Constitutional republic, and also describes the impeachment power. (How many know of the Jewish roots of this document?) Hypocrisy threatens Constitutional government. Could Israel use a constitution like this? More to the point: would a Convention of States save it, or destroy it? (Example: civil asset forfeiture violates the Constitution.) Quick fixes like Regulation Freedom Amendments weaken it. Furthermore: the Constitution provides for removing, and punishing, a judge who commits treason in his rulings. Furthermore, opponents who engage in lawfare against an elected President risk breaking the Constitution.

Health care reform bill call to prayer

Tomorrow (February 17th, 2012), the Supreme Court of the United States will decide whether they will hear the People’s petition on whether Obama-care is constitutional and whether Mr. Obama was eligible to sign the “act” into law.

We the People’s” petition is the most comprehensive action showing 19 violations of the Constitution and four statutory acts that prove Obama-care is unconstitutional. Among them: Count 6, which asks whether Mr. Obama is Constitutionally authorized to hold the office of the Presidency, sign bills into law, or appoint federal judges and create regulation that can destroy the United States.

I ask every American to pray that they decide to include our petition, Purpura v. Sebelius, Docket No. 11-7275, at oral argument on March 26-27, 2012.

The Bible tells us (2 Chronicles 17:4, Good News Translation):

If they pray to me and repent and turn away from the evil they have been doing, then I will hear them in heaven, forgive their sins, and make their land prosperous again.

I ask all Americans to pray, and tell everyone on your e-mail lists to do the same – let’s get this throughout the United States – our republic depends upon each of you – we are either a nation of law or a nation ruled by men! I say we are a nation of law!

Related:

Health care reform bill re-argument

[amazon_carousel widget_type=”ASINList” width=”500″ height=”250″ title=”” market_place=”US” shuffle_products=”True” show_border=”False” asin=”B00375LOEG, 0451947673, 0800733940, 0062073303, 1595230734, 1936218003, 0981559662, 1935071874, 1932172378″ /][subscribe2]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

constitutional law, healthcare reform, judiciary, president, Tea Party

Comments (11)

  • Since two of the “Justices” will be out of a job if Obama was never Preident, there is NO way this will get an unbiased hearing. The case will be denied certeriori “because we said so.”

    Besides, somebody “got to” the judge in Georgia (even though Obama’s team failed to show up) and that case went down in flames. That makes it that much harder to convince the Supremes that “hey, wait a minute, we’ve got something new for you to consider!”

    The only way we win this is for the Supreme Judge to overrule the Supreme Court. The deck is stacked…only a miracle can make the right side win.

    • Not so fast. Last time they denied the petition, they said so on the last business day. They haven’t said it yet. That might be because today, being President’s Day, is a Federal holiday.

      • OK I will grant you that, I was not confident of my source anyways. I was wondering why it was all quiet on this case. I thought we would recive some news on the 17th.

      • Re-hearing was denied, as expected.

        No. 11-7275
        Title:
        Nicholas E. Purpura, et al., Petitioners
        v.
        Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.
        Docketed: November 9, 2011
        Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
        Case Nos.: (11-2303)
        Decision Date: September 29, 2011

        ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        Oct 31 2011 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2011)
        Nov 25 2011 Request for recusal received from petitioner
        Dec 9 2011 Waiver of right of respondents Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. to respond filed.
        Dec 15 2011 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 6, 2012.
        Jan 9 2012 Petition DENIED.
        Jan 16 2012 Petition for Rehearing filed.
        Feb 1 2012 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2012.
        Feb 21 2012 Rehearing DENIED.

        • Something tells me that, despite having been knocked back twice by a conservative-majority court, we’re about to hear how this is all a conspiracy… or something.

          Please, please prove me wrong and let this whole nonsense die quietly. Whether you like it or not, Obama is your president. He has been so since he was inaugurated and will continue to be so until his term limit expires in early 2017.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.



© All Rights Reserved. Conservative News and Views.

Back to Top