Creation Day 2 – Fire in Water

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On Creation Day 2, God called the “firmament” “heaven.” So says Genesis 1:8. Could the word that translates as “heaven” mean something else?

Summary of Creation Day Two

The Bible says that God formed an expanse, like a hammered-out sheet (Hebrew רָקִ֫יעַ (raqia, a large, thin expanse), between waters, to divide the waters above it from the waters beneath it. The most obvious place for an expanse between waters is not in outer space, but on the earth itself. The expanse was the earth’s crust, that would later sag in some places and rise in others, so that dry land would appear (Creation Day Three).

The next verse (Genesis 1:8) seems confusing: “God called the expanse the skies.” (Hebrew שמים shamayim sky, skies.) Why call it “sky” when it was not the sky at all? But this assumes that the word that translates as “skies” or “heavens” always means that.

A rooted language

Rabbi Shlomo bar Yitzhak. His commentaries suggest another meaning of a key Creation Day Two verse.

Rabbi Shlomo bar Yitzhak. From Postillae maiores totius anni cum glossis & quaestionibus by Guillaume de Parisiensis (Lyon, 1539)

Hebrew is likely the most ancient language that man speaks or ever spoke. A modern language borrows from ancient languages for the roots of many or most of its words. (Seventy percent of English words have Latin and/or Greek roots.) An ancient language has its own roots; those roots can come from nowhere else. So every word in Hebrew of more than one or two syllables very likely has much simpler words as roots.

The roots of the word shamayim are אש (esh, fire) and מים (mim, water) The beginning letter א (aleph) is a silent stand-in for a beginning consonant, nothing more. Dropping it does not change the meaning of the two-letter word. So the Hebrew שמים literally means fire in water.

Rabbi Shlomo bar Yitzhak (1040-1105), or Rashi for short, was the greatest of the Jewish commentators on the Old Testament during the Middle Ages. Concerning Genesis 1:8, he says this:

The word shamayim is a contraction of [a word for] carrying of water, also [a word meaning] there is water, also esh and mim, [meaning] fire and water. He blended them with one another and made the heavens from them.

A blend of fire and water seems a good metaphor for outer space. Water is one of the most abundant substances in space, and all stars burn. But Walter T. Brown believes that “fire in water” refers to something closer to home.

Fire in water on earth

Fire in water - a possible explanation for a key verse for Creation Day Two

Methane, dissolved in supercritical water, burns with access to enough oxygen.

Brown, in In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood, describes his word study of shamayim here. But elsewhere he describes something that one sees only in water that becomes supercritical. A supercritical fluid is a fluid at a higher-than-critical temperature and pressure. Such a fluid contains liquid and gas dissolved in one another. And supercritical water can dissolve a flammable gas, like methane, and is also hot enough to split into the gases that make it up. Thus supercritical water, even without access to air, can support the burning of a dissolved flammable gas. Thus fire can appear literally in water, if the water is hot and compressed enough.

Brown also reminds us that on Creation Day Three, when the earth’s crust sagged and formed pillars, those pillars grew hot enough to glow under the tremendous pressure (enough to make rock flow like putty, or concrete mix). The burning of methane in the subcrustal ocean would have come later, certainly after Creation Day Four when God formed the moon. (The tides pumped the crust and heated the water beneath it.) But the glowing pillars would have looked enough like “fire in water” to fit such a description.

So perhaps God blended fire in water, not only in outer space but also in the depths of the earth. Not a man is likely ever to have seen it, but it would have been no less real. Concerning this, Brown himself says:

While in Jerusalem on 28 June 1990, I met for two hours with Michael Klein, Dean of Hebrew Union College. My question was, “What did raqia (expanse) and shamayim (heaven) mean in Genesis 1:8a when Moses wrote Genesis?” To my surprise, he suggested Rabbi Yitzchaki’s translation, which I had previously studied. Shamayim is a compound of the words fire (esh) and liquid water (mayim). After I briefly explained the hydroplate theory, Dean Kline said that raqia (as opposed to “raqia of the heavens”) might well have been the earth’s crust—appropriately called “fire in waters.” You decide.

Related:

Editor-in-chief at | + posts

Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.

8 Responses to Creation Day 2 – Fire in Water

  1. James Houston says:

    “Hebrew is likely the most ancient language that man speaks or ever spoke.”

    Absolute, arrant nonsense. Just from immediate memory I can tell you that Sumerian, Egyptian, Luvian, Minoan and Hittite are older than Hebrew, and if I had to think about it I could name ten others.

    Please provide a source for your bizarre and inaccurate claim.

    • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

      The scholarship that I believe you rely on, itself relies on the paradigm of evolution for its claim that Hebrew somehow derives from other languages, including some of those you named.

      I don’t accept that paradigm, and I say that much of the scholarship on languages is simply wrong.

      If that sounds radical to you, I intend it so. My mission is to strike at the roots of the modernistic and atheistic scholarly establishment.

      • George says:

        Terry A. Hurlbut you seem to be implying here that Hebrew was the first language and all other languages adapted or “micro-evolved” from that original language revealed to Adam. Does this mean in your view that Native American, Aboriginal Australian and African languages were all derived from Hebrew in the last few thousand years?

        If so I would be very interested in an article on that subject. Should you have already published such an article, could you please forgive my ignorance and be so kind as to provide a link? Thank you.

        • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

          This article is the only one I myself have written on the subject. But I have a source who has studied these ancient languages far more thoroughly than I have. He points out that Hebrew, unique among the languages of the Near East, has an alphabet with letters that have names that really mean something. (The names of the Greek letters derive directly from the Hebrew names, and whoever coined those names seemed to have no clue to their original meanings.) That’s only the beginning. He says that human language began with Hebrew, spread to the Far East, and then, with Sanskrit as a bridge, came back to the west.

          • George says:

            Thank you for replying so promptly. I read your “Ancient Hebrew text supports early origin of Bible” article and I appreciate your sharing the link. Would you be willing to divulge any of the writings of the more knowledgeable source you mentioned? I am specifically interested in how the thousands of modern living languages which appear to be so diverse came about in the time since the berthing of Noah’s Ark.

            From what I gather it has been roughly 4,000 years since the flood and all extra-Semitic languages, races and religions would necessarily have their origin somewhere in this time period. Am I completely off base? Thank you for your time.

          • Terry A. Hurlbut says:

            I will, when, as, and if the source is physically ready to talk to me. He recently had a stroke and is still trying to recover from that.

  2. […] Reprinted from Conservative News and Views This entry was posted in Apologetics and tagged creation, evidence, scientific theory by Terry Hurlbut. Bookmark the permalink. […]

  3. […] “The roots of the word shamayim are אש (esh, fire) and מים (mim, water) The beginning letter א (aleph) is a silent stand-in for a beginning consonant, nothing more. Dropping it does not change the meaning of the two-letter word. So the Hebrew שמים literally means fire in water.”  {Summary of Creation Day Two} […]

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.