Mark Levin, hypocrite

The Constitution assumed local control of most government functions, not the current centralized system.
Print Friendly

Everyone who knows of or who has heard Mark Levin may be under the false perception that he cares about this country, where it’s headed and the slow destruction of our Constitution. Of course it would be very easy to find oneself in that group, since his rants and raves seem to bespeak that allegiance. But his actions, his spineless avoidance of the one thing that could, if everyone stood together, actually stop Obama’s destruction of our country, has proven, Mr. Levin cares more about his personal wealth than he does about this country and the Constitution he continues to act as if he supports.

Mark Levin ignores Article II of the Constitution

The Constitution. Mark Levin pretends to defend it but ignores a key part.

The US Constitution. Photo: National Archives of the United States

This so called fiery defender of our Constitution is a phony. Over and over again he references and espouses the merits and qualities of the Constitution while ignoring the most egregious breach of it this country has ever seen. This supposed “expert” and author on all things constitutional cares not about Article II and why our founding fathers meticulously authored the “Natural Born Citizen” stipulation. TPATH has written to Mark Levin several times and has asked him to explain just what it was that the founding fathers meant when they wrote that Article. Of course, we have never received an answer. Nor will we ever, because like Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate, one does not exist.

Mark Levin not only refuses to discuss or explain his position on this issue but if anyone who does really care about this country and the usurpation of our laws, has the nerve to bring up the topic, that person is belittled and immediately dumped from the call. The message is, if you don’t fall in line with him and shut up about Obama’s false documents you are an idiot and need to be silenced.

A smoking-gun example from the Mark Levin show

If there was any doubt that Mark Levin has been ordered to avoid anything that references Obama’s crimes, just last week a caller, having a very educated and intelligent conversation with Levin and as a result of the trend of the debate, mentioned that Obama’s Social Security number had failed E-Verify. Instantly, the dump button was hit and the disrespectful comment that followed was this. (Paraphrasing)

Mr. Producer, one of THEM got through.

So to Levin, anyone who dares consider, discuss or even contemplate that Obama has forged documents, has spent millions of dollars hiding others, is one of THEM!

A double standard on fraud and forgery

Just a quick question to the hypocrite. How many times in the political history of this country has the left not used, misinterpreted, exaggerated and exploited the smallest of missteps which may have been taken by a Conservative or a Republican? How many times have they actually invented things, banded together and relentlessly pounded the American people with them, until the fabrication becomes “common knowledge”?

Yet, here we have a person sitting in the White House, clearly not eligible under our Constitution, forged then issued fake birth certificates, altered Selective Service records, has been using a Social Security number which was issued to someone in Connecticut and has never provided one credible piece of documentation relating to where he was born, and our so-called leaders, both Republicans and phony talk show hosts have no ability to band together and use the only tool America has that could get this criminal out of our White House.

One of them, but not one of yours

Mark Levin, I am done with you. Your selective rants about the Constitution make me want to hurl my lunch. It is clear, you may speak loudly and you may seem to be passionate, but in my book, you are a spineless hypocrite.

Finally you might be interested in knowing, Mark, about 80% of your audience is smart enough to know there is much wrong with Obama and his eligibility and probably be considered, one of them. Many of us remain being one of them, but I am no longer one of yours.

Reprinted from Tea Party Advocacy Tracking Hub